1831–present

The Book of Abraham and the Joseph Smith Papyri

A scripture, a scroll, and the one translation that could be checked

20 sources, ordered by evidentiary weight — primary and contemporary first, then documentary editions, then the argument. All of them are held as full text in the Mormon Corpus.

1835

Book of Abraham Manuscripts A, B and C, circa July–circa November 1835

Frederick G. Williams, Warren Parrish, William W. Phelps (scribes)

Primary source Primary Text held in the CorpusJoseph Smith Papers, full diplomatic transcripts plus editorial introductions

The earliest English text of Abraham 1:1–2:18, with Egyptian characters copied into the left margins beside paragraph-length English passages.

1835

Grammar and Alphabet of the Egyptian Language, circa July–circa November 1835

William W. Phelps (principal scribe)

Primary source Primary Text held in the CorpusJoseph Smith Papers, full transcript; the related Egyptian Alphabet documents A, B and C are held alongside it

What Smith and his scribes actually believed Egyptian characters meant — Kolob, Jah-oh-eh, Zip Zi and the rest — in a system of 'degrees' that corresponds to nothing in Egyptology.

1835–1836

History, 1834–1836 (Kirtland journal-derived history)

Joseph Smith, Warren Parrish, Frederick G. Williams

Primary source Primary Text held in the CorpusJoseph Smith Papers, full transcript

Day-by-day Kirtland entries: labor on the Egyptian alphabet on 1 October 1835 when 'the system of astronomy was unfolded,' and the 17 November exhibition of 'the Alphabet of the ancient Egyptian Records' to the visitor Erastus Holmes.

1838–1856

History, 1838–1856, volume B-1 [1 September 1834–2 November 1838]

Joseph Smith and clerks

Primary source Primary Text held in the CorpusJoseph Smith Papers, full transcript

The July 1835 statement that Smith was 'continually engaged in translating an alphabet to the Book of Abraham, and arrangeing a grammar of the Egyptian language as practiced by the ancients.'

1842

Times and Seasons, Volume 3 (1841–1842)

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (Joseph Smith, editor)

Primary source Primary Text held in the CorpusHeld complete as a scanned periodical; the Joseph Smith Papers also holds the 1 March 1842 issue and the document 'Book of Abraham and Facsimiles, 1 March–16 May 1842'

The Book of Abraham as published: Facsimile 1 and Abraham 1:1–2:18 on 1 March, Facsimile 2 and the remainder on 15 March, Facsimile 3 on 16 May, each facsimile with Joseph Smith's own numbered explanation.

1856

Bill of sale, Lewis C. Bidamon and Emma Bidamon to A. Combs, 26 May 1856

Lewis C. Bidamon, Emma Smith Bidamon, Joseph Smith III

Primary source Primary Text held in the CorpusReproduced in full in Dialogue 16:4 (Stanley B. Kimball); the document itself was found with the Metropolitan Museum fragments

That the mummies and records were 'purchased by the Mormon Prophet Joseph Smith at the price of twenty four hundred dollars in the year Eighteen hundred thirty-five,' and how the collection left the family.

1835

"Egyptian Mummies—Ancient Records" (Oliver Cowdery to William Frye, 22 December 1835)

Oliver Cowdery

Primary source Contemporary Text held in the CorpusLatter Day Saints' Messenger and Advocate (Kirtland, 1834–1837) held in full

The church's first public account of the acquisition, including the denial that the mummies were Abraham, Abimelech or Joseph, and the disposition of the eleven mummies.

2014

"Translation and Historicity of the Book of Abraham," Gospel Topics Essays

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Official LDS Official Text held in the CorpusGospel Topics Essays held in full text

Exactly what the institution now concedes about the fragments, the grammar book and the translation process — and exactly what it leaves open.

1912

Joseph Smith, Jr., As a Translator

Franklin S. Spalding

Secondary source Scholarly Text held in the CorpusHeld as full text (28 pp.), including the facsimile explanations and the eight scholars' letters

The first organized expert test of the facsimiles, and the exact wording of the judgments by Sayce, Petrie, Breasted, Mace, Peters, Mercer, Meyer and von Bissing.

1968

"The Joseph Smith Papyri: A Preliminary Report," Dialogue 3:2 (Summer 1968)

Richard A. Parker

Nuanced Scholarly Text held in the CorpusDialogue held effectively complete as scanned issues; the same issue carries John A. Wilson's summary report and the Heward–Tanner identification of the source

The first published Egyptological reading of the recovered fragments, identifying Facsimile 1's original as an Osiris-mysteries scene with jackal-headed Anubis and the hovering Isis-falcon.

1968

"The Breathing Permit of Hôr: A Translation of the Apparent Source of the Book of Abraham," Dialogue 3:3 (Autumn 1968)

Klaus Baer

Nuanced Scholarly Text held in the CorpusDialogue, full scanned issue

The first complete translation of the surviving Hor Book of Breathings, including the vignettes that bracketed it, and Baer's judgment that Smith took this papyrus to be the Book of Abraham.

1983

"Mormon Mummies 1848–71," Dialogue 16:4 (1983)

Stanley B. Kimball

Nuanced Scholarly Text held in the CorpusDialogue, full scanned issue

The route of the collection from Nauvoo through William Smith, Abel Combs, Wyman's St. Louis Museum and the Chicago museums to Wood's Museum and the fire of October 1871.

2000

"The 'Breathing Permit of Hôr' Thirty-four Years Later," Dialogue 33:4 (2000)

Robert K. Ritner

Nuanced Scholarly Text held in the CorpusDialogue, full scanned issue; the same issue carries Edward Ashment on the characters in the margins

A revised technical edition of the Hor document confirming Baer, and the naming of Facsimile 3's figures as Osiris, Isis, Maat, Anubis and Hor.

2010

"The Original Length of the Scroll of Hôr," Dialogue 43:4 (2010)

Andrew W. Cook and Christopher C. Smith

Nuanced Scholarly Text held in the CorpusDialogue, full scanned issue

A scroll-geometry argument that no more than about 56 centimetres of the interior of the Hor roll is missing — the core empirical challenge to the missing-scroll theory.

2016

"Assessing the Joseph Smith Papyri: An Introduction to the Historiography of their Acquisitions, Translations, and Interpretations"

Kerry Muhlestein

Faithful / apologetic Apologetic Text held in the CorpusInterpreter Foundation, full article

The faithful-Egyptological framing: that belief or disbelief in translation by divine gift is a prior faith commitment, and a menu of three permissible faithful theories of the source.

2019

"The Joseph Smith Papers Project Stumbles" (review of Revelations and Translations, Volume 4)

John Gee

Faithful / apologetic Apologetic Text held in the CorpusInterpreter Foundation, full article, together with the editors' reply and Gee's rejoinder 'Taking Stock'

That the fight over the Kirtland Egyptian Papers is now internal: a BYU Egyptologist publicly charging the Church's own documentary edition with substandard content and unacknowledged assumptions.

2019

"A Precious Resource with Some Gaps"

Jeffrey D. Lindsay

Faithful / apologetic Apologetic Text held in the CorpusInterpreter Foundation, full article including reader comments

Brian Hauglid's own statement repudiating his earlier apologetic work — the clearest documentation that the faithful side has split.

1987

Mormonism—Shadow or Reality?

Jerald Tanner and Sandra Tanner

Evangelical counter-cult Critical Text held in the CorpusUtah Lighthouse Ministry, full text; The Case Against Mormonism vols. 2–3 also held

The counter-cult case and, more usefully, the documentary trail of the 1968 identification of the Small Sensen fragment as the source, largely through Grant Heward's work.

2013

Letter to a CES Director ("the CES Letter")

Jeremy Runnells

Disaffected Critical Text held in the CorpusHeld in full text; FAIR's page-by-page reply is also held, tagged as a rebuttal-compilation

How the Book of Abraham functions in contemporary faith crises — Runnells calls it 'the smoking gun that has completely obliterated my testimony of Joseph Smith.'

2021

"Book of Abraham Overview: Translation and Source Materials" and the annotated Gospel Topics essay

LDS Discussions

Critical / secular Critical Text held in the CorpusLDS Discussions essay series, full text

The line-by-line critical reading of the 2014 essay, including the argument that Abraham 1:12–14 ties the text to Facsimile 1 and so defeats both the missing-scroll and catalyst theories.

What this topic needs that the corpus does not hold

  • Charles M. Larson, By His Own Hand Upon Papyrus (1992) — cited constantly across the corpus and answered chapter-by-chapter on FAIR's rebuttal pages, but the book itself is NOT held. What comes back under that title is either FAIR's rebuttal compilation reproducing Larson's argument in order to answer it, or a BYU Studies article of similar name.
  • Hugh Nibley's own Book of Abraham corpus is absent as text: 'The Meaning of the Kirtland Egyptian Papers' (BYU Studies 11:4, 1971), The Message of the Joseph Smith Papyri (1975), Abraham in Egypt, and the Improvement Era 'A New Look at the Pearl of Great Price' series. The corpus returns the BYU Studies issue table of contents and hundreds of citations, not the articles.
  • The technical Egyptological literature: Ritner's The Joseph Smith Egyptian Papyri: A Complete Edition, Michael D. Rhodes's The Hor Book of Breathings, Marc Coenen's dating studies, and John Gee's A Guide to the Joseph Smith Papyri and An Introduction to the Book of Abraham. All are cited heavily; none are held.
  • The Improvement Era and Ensign are effectively absent (three articles total), so the Church's own 1968 publication of the papyri photographs, Jay M. Todd's reporting, and the decades of Nibley's serialized defense can only be reached second-hand through critics and apologists who quote them.
  • Joseph Smith Papers scope excludes Kinderhook material entirely, so the Kinderhook plates — the natural control case for Joseph Smith as translator — cannot be worked from primary documents here; Clayton's journal entry is reachable only as quoted by the Tanners and by FAIR.

Related topics

People who also appear elsewhere